![]() Martin chose to do business and contract with Top Quality Professional Construction, LLC (the LLC). Applying Indiana Small Claims Rule 10(B), Tina Krise did not need to appear, and, quite properly, she was not defaulted. Specifically, he believes that he is entitled to a default judgement against Tina Krise because she failed to appear. ![]() Martin claims that our opinion failed to address “the Trial Court’s significant departure from the trial rules.” Pet. Whether our decision was dispositive of all the material issues raised as errors on appeal. Whether we erred in significantly misquoting a particular passage of his brief, resulting in a gross mischaracterization of Martin’s argument. Whether our published decision was dispositive of all the material issues raised as error on appeal and Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion on Rehearing 21A-SC-1337 | Febru of 4 2. He raises the following two claims of error: 1. Appellant Martin, by counsel, has filed a petition for rehearing. Appeal from the Washington Township Small Claims Court The Honorable Steven G. ![]() Joe Krise, Tina Krise, Top Quality Professional Construction, LLC, Appellee-Defendants. Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Sjon Martin, FebruAppellant-Plaintiff, Court of Appeals Case No. FILED Feb 28 2022, 9:30 am OPINION ON REHEARING CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Eric C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |